Operationalizing digital self-determination

Abstract A proliferation of data-generating devices, sensors, and applications has led to unprecedented amounts digital data. We live in an era datafication, one which life is increasingly quantified transformed into intelligence for private or public benefit. When used responsibly, this offers new opportunities good. The potential data evident the possibilities offered by open collaboratives—both instances how wider access can lead positive often dramatic social transformation. However, three key forms asymmetry currently limit potential, especially already vulnerable marginalized groups: asymmetries, information agency asymmetries. These asymmetries human both a practical psychological sense, leading feelings disempowerment eroding trust technology. Existing methods (such as consent) well some alternatives under consideration (data ownership, collective personal management systems) have limitations adequately address challenges at hand. principle practice self-determination (DSD) therefore required. study DSD remain its infancy. characteristics we outlined here are only exploratory, much work remains be done so better understand what works does not. suggest need research framework agenda explore it imbalances, inequalities—both society more generally—that emerging policy our era.